CIVILIZATION 5 OR 6 CODE

I do notice more ai cheating in civ 6 than I noticed in civ 5, but IвЂ™m not involved with the code so donвЂ™t really know if the current cheats it employs are any less or more cheap than the cheats it employed in 5.Д«ut yeah I prefer 6, just for the depth. But I think they are gradually fleshing combat out with updates, and will continue to do so. A lot of people complain about the combat difference but I donвЂ™t really notice it the way I prefer to play.

I just stick with this because I know itвЂ™s being developed. Ultimately I own civ 5 and played it a tonne but I donвЂ™t ever really think about dropping back in and playing it anymore. Culture is now fleshed out to more things than just art, and is quite interesting. LetвЂ™s you gauge better if you should rage quit or not. Victory leaderboards gives you more info on what part of science you are behind in. It is easier to catch up if you are behind in tech nowadays. Civ 5 on anything above quick felt abit like a drag. Civ 6 is definitely different, with taking longer to achieve science victory, I think itвЂ™s generally a longer game if you play at correct speeds. In civ 5 city states also acted a little more aggressively than they currently do. You could cheese city states and declare war and peace on same turn in civ 5. And if it got pillaged you needed replacement builde, though you did had explicit control over where they go, was fun playing atilla online and building a road to the city you are about to siege for your rams. The simplicity of roads I find useful in civ 6 was very tedious took a long time to establish roads in civ 5, also expensive. I find combat to be mostly the same, though maybe I am facing off against smaller armies or ai is making less decisions about war unless it knows it will win. The activity in the world with GS i prefer.

Great people do more stuff than build tiles and expend for 1 time yield. Diplomatic victory is no longer a matter of buying states, and is now with envoy much more district dependent. I also like the amount of wonders we have, and the uniqueness of city states in what they offer. I like how everything is unique like harvesting resources give you different yields. I honestly prefer the new leader styles, find them more immersive. I like dark ages and loyalty and heroic ages. Governments were less interesting in civ 5 and fixed. Like the civ 5 patronage trees etc etc was fairly controlled and linear. I preferred civ 5 originally, but I can do a lot of stuff in 6 and it feels vastly different.

CIVILIZATION 5 OR 6 FULL

In Civ6, especially if I start near ones, all I can see are targets, due to the poor combat AI, that allow me to keep up with the AIs breakneck expansion and keep my exponential settler growth cost down (while city states offer powerful bonuses you generally need a pretty well developed civilization to take full advantage).Д¬iv 6 I reckon: didnвЂ™t think this at first though. In Civ5, I find a variety of reasons to keep them alive. Civ6 has no such mechanic and I find myself constantly razing crap unproductive settlements, like some Civ gardener, in order to expand or prune my borders ('oh look another city that is blocking my access to a river tile for my settlers').Д¬ity states also suffer. Civ5 has a tall playstyle issue yet the expansion penalties help offset the AIs fungus like growth across the map. Yet my biggest complaint is how its forced me to change my gameplay style to a warmonger. Civ6 simply added too many features that, while good for multiplayer, are beyond the AIs ability to handle correctly. The Civ5 AI is still pretty dumb and I played poorly on that run but I've never had that issue in Civ6 so I'd forgotten to build counters. Imagine my surprise when my seaborne invasion was crushed by a wave of German bombers. For example, replayed Civ5 recently and was used to the much more limited airpower of Civ6 (mostly because the AI struggles to build airfields). I'm convinced Firaxis has only given the AI stronger cheats rather than address the underlying issues. However, Civ5 has a number of stronger game systems (the espionage and world congress systems are so much better) and the Civ6 AI is a bonehead. Civ6 has its strengths, particularly an improved combat system (I really miss corps and armies in civ5) and a number of quality of life improvements (Inspirations, Eurekas, better base terrain tile output, the ability to build harbors in cities that aren't directly on the coast, unmodded canals, etc.). I've been replaying Civ5 lately and I find it to be the better game.

Civilization 5 or 6